« I'll sign the dotted line. | Main | The world is a conspiracy »

Ella probably wears Supergirl underoos

Ella Gunderson has become the unofficial spokesgirl for a new trend in adolescent fashion: modesty. Consider her letter to Nordstrom regarding the "shocking" state of current fashion for young girls:

"Dear Nordstrom," wrote Gunderson, of Redmond, Wash. "I am an eleven-year-old girl who has tried shopping at your store for clothes (in particular jeans), but all of them ride way under my hips, and the next size up is too big and falls down."

"I see all of these girls who walk around with pants that show their belly button and underwear," she continued. "Your clearks sugjest that there is only one look. If that is true, then girls are suppost to walk around half naked. I think that you should change that." (sic)

Good for her. She noticed an issue at the store where she likes to shop and did something about it. All children should learn to take action instead of whining. This story is one proof that not all kids buy into the pop culture fashion requirement.

The full blame can't be placed on Nordstrom because they don't dictate trends. They predict by ordering ahead of season, but will not continue with a trend if the clothes don't sell. One walk around the mall proves that these clothes are selling.

While I do believe that current fashion trends are ridiculous, parents have to take responsibility. Kids need to be taught to rely on their inner guidance. Trends and fashion are ok, but when it goes too far (which is subjective, even in this case), they need to be taught to appreciate their own views.

What I don't like is that this will become an example that teenagers are turning away from Satan and towards Christ. Using this trend shift to brainwash children that their bodies are "dirty" will be a missed opportunity to teach them to think for themselves. At some point, as a society, we must embrace the belief that teaching kids to think independently does not automatically mean they will turn away from the beliefs of their parents. They should not be given trite or ridiculous slogans, such as the one used by ModestByDesign.com: "Clothing your father would be proud of". Good plan... teach young girls that they should focus on clothes approved by their fathers... because they can't want them for any other reason than to please an older man. I'm over-simplifying, but not by much.

This is the same culture that prefers McPapers for the morning commute. In Washington, DC, there are two commuter rags that people read every day: The Washington Post Express and The Journal. Both papers are attempting to capitalize on a national trend among newspapers to offer commuter versions. A reasonable idea, but it's been taken to the extreme. These papers offer trimmed down versions of their regular stories, offering the basic point of the story. Unfortunately, they pander to a presumed short attention span and reduced intellect.

As an aside, this is not surprising when journalists can't be bothered to do real research. I've seen this in other news stories, but I'll point it out here because it's relevant. From the Catholic.net article, consider this insightful proof that Ms. Gunderson is a role model:

A Google search of “Ella Gunderson” drew over 70 links to stories from all over the world. Eleven-year-old Ella Gunderson is proof that everyone can make a difference.

I've read The Washington Post Express in the past. This morning, I read The Journal for the first time. The paper is awful, but I searched for an article about Ms. Gunderson because of the report in The Journal. The article, in its entirety, read like this:

Teen proposes decent clothes

During a recent shopping trip to Nordstrom, 11-year-old Ella Gunderson became frustrated with all the low-cut hip-huggers and skintight tops. So she wrote to the Seattle-based chain's executives to complain. The industry has been getting the message: A more modest look is in, fashion experts say.

That's it. How can we teach our kids to think when we so rarely participate in the activity ourselves? I'm scared when I realize that many of the people around me on the Metro, who consider this an acceptable form of news, are going to important government jobs that could help decide the future of our nation and the world.

Comments

I've noticed this trend, too. We have two commuter papers: AM NY and Metro. Metro is far better, in my opinion, as it at least appears to approach journalism. However, this morning I noticed that ALL the news stories are wires directly from the Associated Press (AP)! Apparently journalists just regurgitate whatever the wires put out.

For a brief analysis of this, see an entry in my friend Tim's blog:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/tim1965/33589.html?thread=41013#t41013

Uh?Is every thing a cospiracy? Who is Will? Kids now have got so much peer pressure to deal with. Course the cave I lived in didn't have too many fashion choices. But I did try to wear clothes that fit me and looked fairly good. Pox on those chicks in my class that had the Pendleton skirts and sweaterw.. But I got the last laugh. All those chicky's are way to chubby to wear those clothes and they don't have a 25 year old Rock Star either. PS I don't either but in my dreams I DO!

Leaving the journalism comments to Will. Here's my two cents...

" Kids need to be taught to rely on their inner guidance."

Couldn't agree more.

An anecdote from today...

It's not often that I will show a video in my classroom, but when I do, it's for a reason.

Today, we watched a short video (20 minutes long). During the entire video, five children thought it would be a good idea to play "follow the leader [we shouldn't be following]" and run through the room, hiding in the block shelves and sitting under easels.

They've been in school long enough to know that this form of behavior isn't acceptable in our classroom. OUR classroom. We're all responsible for upholding the standards of civility we've established, whether we're four or thirty-four. Clearly running and shouting and laughing while thirteen other children are trying to pay attention to a film falls into the category of "inappropriate."

In addition, I constantly stress how important it is to think for oneself. "Copying" someone who is very obviously exhibiting inappropriate behavior is a choice. Even at four years old, decisions have to be made whether it's a choice one should or should not make.

While "Lord of the Flies" continued, I sat, silently, with three children on my lap. I ignored the misbehaving kids, despite the valiant efforts of the other children to tattletale on their peers.

At the end of the video, the kids lined up at the door to go outside and play on the playground. I purposely grouped the five "energetic" students together in line. As we approached the door, I pointed to each of them and said...

"Bench. Bench. Bench. Bench. Bench."

That was all. I didn't deliver empty threats. I didn't belittle or criticize them for their choices. I simply executed a swift and appropriate consequence for their behavior choices. No lecture necessary.

As they sat on the bench, watching their classmates run, jump, slide and swing, they looked miserable. Do I hate to see them feeling that way? Of course I do. I want these children to be happy.

But, more than that, I want them to think about their choices in life, understand that every choice has a consequence, and let history have a hand in dictating the future.

It's called learning to think for oneself.

Creative Commons License